Rapid Room-Temperature Aerosol Dehydration Versus Spray Drying: A Novel Paradigm in Biopharmaceutical Drying Technologies.

To ensure the high quality of biopharmaceutical products, it is imperative to implement specialized unit operations that effectively safeguard the structural integrity of large molecules. While lyophilization has long been a reliable process, spray drying has recently garnered attention for its particle engineering capabilities for the pulmonary route of administration. However, maintaining the integrity of biologics during spray drying remains a challenge. To address this issue, we explored a novel dehydration system based on aerosol-assisted room-temperature drying of biological formulations recently developed at Princeton University, called Rapid Room-Temperature Aerosol Dehydration. We compared the quality attributes of the bulk powder of biopharmaceutical products manufactured using this drying technology with that of traditional spray drying. For all the fragment antigen-binding formulations tested, in terms of protein degradation and aerosol performance, we were able to achieve a better product quality using this drying technology compared to the spray drying technique. We also highlight areas for improvement in future prototypes and prospective commercial versions of the system. Overall, the offered dehydration system holds potential for improving the quality and diversity of biopharmaceutical products and may pave the way for more efficient and effective production methods in the biopharma industry.

Unusual sites of hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis: Case report.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is an increasingly frequent cause of cancer-related death. The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are asymptomatic. In rare cases, patients may present with symptoms of extrahepatic metastases. Early identification can lead to timely treatment and prevent poor outcomes. We report three cases of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with unusual sites of metastasis, including clival, mandible, and cardiac involvement.

A Case of a Rare Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)-Producing Neuroendocrine Tumor.

BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine neoplasms are commonly seen in association with hormone production, and clinical signs that arise from these hormonal effects often manifest as the first presentation of malignancy. The excess production of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in particular, however, is primarily sporadic (80-85%) in clinical settings. In the context of malignancy, hyperparathyroidism manifestations arise most frequently from non-neuroendocrine pulmonary tumors through a ligand mimicker, parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PHrP). Excess PTH or PTHrP production has been very rarely described in association with gastrointestinal tumors and almost never described as a primary paraneoplastic syndrome from a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) alone. CASE REPORT We present a patient with a prior surgically resected carcinoid tumor who later presented with an elevated parathyroid hormone level, hypercalcemia, and clinical manifestations of primary hyperparathyroidism. She was found to have a low-grade, recurrent neuroendocrine tumor on resection of a parathyroid mass suspected to be a productive adenoma. Despite no longer having parathyroid glands given the extent of resection, her PTH level remained elevated and was rising. Further investigation via repeat sestamibi nuclear scan excluded the possibility of exogenous parathyroid tissue, and subsequent dotatate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed the source of the PTH production: multiple sites of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors producing native PTH. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the rare possibility of NETs to secrete PTH and the importance of considering early staging with dotatate PET/CT to evaluate the extent of disease. Additionally, our case reveals the importance of considering NET as an alternative etiology for refractory hypercalcemia.

Digital ischaemia and necrosis from oxaliplatin.

Oxaliplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent used in a variety of malignancies such as colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer. It is a platinum derivative that results in direct cell cytotoxicity with resultant cell death. The most common side effects often noted are neurotoxicity, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression. Oxaliplatin induced digital ischaemia and necrosis is a rare side effect that was observed in our patient. In general, digital ischaemia is a rare vascular disorder that is often associated with autoimmune disease. A patient with digital ischaemia due to oxaliplatin will be described in this case report.

BRIP-1 germline mutation and its role in colon cancer: presentation of two case reports and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary colon cancer is characterized by the inheritance of an abnormal gene mutation which predisposes to malignancy. Recent advances in genomic medicine have identified mutations in "novel" genes as conferring an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Mutations in the BRIP1 gene (BRCA1 Interacting Protein C- terminal helicase 1) are known to increase the risk of ovarian and breast cancers, but this genes association with colon cancer has not been previously reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe two patients with colon cancer whose tumor tissue were found to harbor BRIP1 mutations on analysis by next-generation sequencing. These patients were confirmed by analysis of lymphocytes to carry the mutation in the germline as well. CONCLUSIONS: These case reports highlight a previously unreported association of BRIP1 germline mutations with colon cancer predisposition.

Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Model: A Positive Association Between Oncology Nurse Navigation and Improved Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer often experience prominent deficiencies in cancer care in the immediate period following initial cancer diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to determine whether the inclusion of a gastrointestinal (GI) oncology nurse navigator (ONN) on the multidisciplinary cancer care team is associated with improved quality of care for patients. METHODS: This retrospective study compared randomly selected patients with GI cancer with and without an ONN. Two endpoints, the time from diagnosis to treatment and the average number of missed appointments, were evaluated through a review of healthcare records using the Epic electronic health records system. FINDINGS: Patients with an ONN had a shorter time lapse between diagnosis and treatment commencement (p < 0.001). In this group, the average time spent between initial diagnosis and the start of treatment was 15.15 days, compared to 42.93 days for patients who were not part of the multidisciplinary cancer care model.

Phase 2 trial of induction gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab followed by selective capecitabine-based chemoradiation in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in a phase 2 study, the safety and efficacy of induction gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab followed by selective capecitabine-based chemoradiation in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BRPC or LAPC, respectively). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients received gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy repeated every 14 days for 6 cycles, combined with weekly cetuximab. Patients were then restaged; "downstaged" patients with resectable disease underwent attempted resection. Remaining patients were treated with chemoradiation consisting of intensity modulated radiation therapy (54 Gy) and concurrent capecitabine; patients with borderline resectable disease or better at restaging underwent attempted resection. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, of whom 37 were evaluable. Protocol treatment was generally well tolerated. Median follow-up for all patients was 11.9 months. Overall, 29.7% of patients underwent R0 surgical resection (69.2% of patients with BRPC; 8.3% of patients with LAPC). Overall 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 62%, and median PFS was 10.4 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months. In patients with LAPC, median OS was 9.3 months; in patients with BRPC, median OS was 24.1 months. In the group of patients who underwent R0 resection (all of which were R0 resections), median survival had not yet been reached at the time of analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was well tolerated in patients with BRPC or LAPC, and almost one-third of patients underwent R0 resection. Although OS for the entire cohort was comparable to that in historical controls, PFS and OS in patients with BRPC and/or who underwent R0 resection was markedly improved.

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel, total androgen blockade, and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This was a phase I study to find the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of weekly docetaxel combined with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with localized high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) were treated with weekly docetaxel at 10 to 30 mg/m(2) concurrent with IMRT of 77.4 Gy to the prostate and 45 Gy to the seminal vesicles. ADT consisted of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and bicalutamide beginning 2 months before and during chemoradiation. GnRHa was continued for 24 months. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen with docetaxel doses up to 25 mg/m(2). At the 30 mg/m(2) level, 2 of 4 patients experienced DLTs of both grade 3 fatigue and dyspepsia. At 41 months' median follow-up, 2 patients had died--1 from metastatic prostate cancer and the other from heart failure. Two other patients experienced biochemical failure. One patient with bladder invasion at diagnosis experienced late grade 2 urinary hesitancy 9 months after completion of radiotherapy, requiring short-term intermittent catheterization. All patients had erectile dysfunction, but no late toxicities worse than grade 2 were identified. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel may be combined with high-dose IMRT and long-term ADT up to a MTD of 25 mg/m(2). Acute toxicities and long-term side effects of this regimen were acceptable. Future studies evaluating the efficacy of docetaxel, ADT, and IMRT for localized HRPC should use a weekly dose of 25 mg/m(2) when limiting the irradiated volume to the prostate and seminal vesicles.

Chemotherapeutic and targeted biological agents for metastatic bladder cancer: a comprehensive review.

The American Cancer Society estimates that 73 510 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and 15 000 deaths will result this year. The paper summarizes the clinical evidence for the use of platinum-based, non-platinum-based and new targeted biological agents, while reporting the future directions in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. For cisplatin-base regimens, the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC) has been the mainstream treatment for both advanced and metastatic bladder cancers. It showed significant improvement in the complete response rate and overall survival time in comparison with single-agent cisplatin. For cisplatin-ineligible patients, namely patients with renal impairment, symptomatic cardiac disease and poor performance status, alternative therapies consisting of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin were shown to be of benefit. Pemetrexed and vinflunine have also shown effectiveness, with small but demonstrable overall survival benefits. Gemcitabine-based doublet therapies (combined with paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, oxaliplatin or epirubicin) have all been shown to be effective and well-tolerated. Several new targeted therapies, such as gefetinib, sorafenib and lapatinib, have received attention in recent years; however, their effectiveness as single agents in a relapse setting have not been optimal and more studies are warranted.

A phase II study of gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and irinotecan (Irinogem) in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Irinotecan and gemcitabine are newer-generation chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, nonoverlapping toxicity profiles, and synergistic activity in vitro. METHODS: Sixteen patients have been enrolled, of which 13 are evaluable for response. The median age is 68.5 years (range, 52 to 82 y). According to the Bajorin prognostic model for metastatic bladder cancer, 8 patients were classified as "low risk" and 8 as "intermediate risk." Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m and irinotecan 100 mg/m were administered on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. All patients had histologically proven transitional cell cancer of the bladder with bidimensionally measurable disease. All but 2 patients were chemotherapy naive at enrollment. RESULTS: The median number of cycles administered was 4. Among the 13 patients evaluable for efficacy, objective radiographic response was documented in 8 patients (2 complete and 6 partial responses), 4 had stable disease, and 1 progressed on therapy. Median progression-free survival was 8.78 months (95% confidence interval, 5.98-15.38) and median overall survival was 13.51 months (95% confidence interval, 8.02-21.93). Toxicity evaluated in all 16 patients was modest: 2 episodes of febrile neutropenia, grades 3 to 4 neutropenia in 4 patients, grades 3 to 4 diarrhea in 2 patients, grades 3 to 4 fatigue in 1 patient, grades 3 to 4 nausea/vomiting in 2 patients, grades 3 to 4 neurological toxicity in 1 patient, and no grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia. No toxic deaths were noted. One patient discontinued therapy due to grade 4 fatigue, 1 due to stroke, 1 due to grade 4 colitis, 1 due to progressive disease, and 1 declined to participate in the trial after receiving the first cycle of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggested that the combination of Irinogem was an effective treatment for patients with metastatic bladder cancer, with manageable toxicities. The study was closed early due to delays in accrual and loss of funding. Hence, the study lacks adequate power to make definite conclusions. Further studies in multi-institutional setting in patients with normal and compromised renal function are warranted.

Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine plus doxorubicin in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers: serum C18-ceramide as a novel biomarker for monitoring response.

PURPOSE: Here we report a phase II clinical trial, which was designed to test a novel hypothesis that treatment with gemcitabine (GEM)/doxorubicin (DOX) would be efficacious via reconstitution of C(18)-ceramide signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients for whom first-line platinum-based therapy failed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received GEM (1,000 mg/m²) and DOX (25 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression. After completion of 2 treatment cycles, patients were assessed radiographically, and serum samples were taken for sphingolipid measurements. RESULTS: We enrolled 18 patients in the trial, who were evaluable for toxicity, and 17 for response. The most common toxicity was neutropenia, observed in 9 of 18 patients, and there were no major nonhematologic toxicities. Of the 17 patients, 5 patients had progressive disease (PD), 1 had complete response (CR), 3 exhibited partial response (PR), and 8 had stable disease (SD). The median progression-free survival was 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.2) with a median survival of 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.8-18.2). Remarkably, serum sphingolipid analysis revealed significant differences in patterns of C18-ceramide elevation in patients with CR/PR/SD in comparison with patients with PD, indicating the reconstitution of tumor suppressor ceramide generation by GEM/DOX treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the GEM/DOX combination could represent an effective treatment for some patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, and that serum C18-ceramide elevation might be a novel serum biomarker of chemotherapy response.

Finasteride.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in males in the US. Prostate cancer chemoprevention entails the use of agents which retard or inhibit the progression to invasive disease. Chemoprevention is an attractive option for patients with prostate cancer given the hormonally responsive nature of cancer, long latency period and high prevalence of the disease. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This review outlines a detailed background on the development of finasteride as a chemopreventive agent for prostate cancer. It discusses the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, a large randomized clinical trial that showed reduction in prostate cancer prevalence through the use of finasteride. In addition, an in-depth discussion involving theories on a higher incidence of high-grade cancer in the finasteride arm is presented. Other notable recently completed randomized trials and novel chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer are discussed as well. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Readers will get an in-depth understanding of the balance of risks and benefits of finasteride for prevention of prostate cancer. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Finasteride was the first 5alpha-reductase inhibitor to show a benefit in reducing prevalence of prostate cancer. It is well tolerated but a higher incidence of high-grade prostate cancer in men taking finasteride has hindered its use in clinical practice. It may temporarily shrink tumors that have a low potential for being lethal and is not approved as a chemopreventive agent.

Primary testicular lymphoma and AIDS.

Immunosuppressed patients have an increased risk for developing extranodal lymphoma, including testicular lymphoma. In AIDS patients, primary testicular lymphoma has been reported as an initial manifestation of the disease. These patients typically present at an early age; their lymphomas usually have aggressive histologic appearance and are associated with poor prognosis. We report a testicular lymphoma consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in an AIDS patient and we review the literature on primary testicular lymphoma in AIDS patients.

Toxicity and survival outcomes of hyperfractionated split-course reirradiation and daily concurrent chemotherapy in locoregionally recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: : Reirradiation of locoregionally recurrent, previously irradiated head/neck cancer may be considered in situations of unresectability, medical inoperability, or adverse pathologic features found at salvage resection. METHODS: : Retrospective cohort analysis of toxicity and survival outcomes in locoregionally recurrent, previously irradiated patients with head/neck cancer treated with hyperfractionated split-course radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS: : Between March 1998 and September 2006, 39 patients initiated reirradiation at median of 2.3 years (range, 0.5-19) following prior radiotherapy. At median survivor follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 3-63.9), 10 patients are alive without evidence of disease. Median survival is 19.0 months, with estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survivals of 60.1%, 45.1%, and 22.7%, respectively. Locoregional failure was the predominant site of postreirradiation recurrence. Male sex, total radiotherapy dose, cycles of chemotherapy completed, and clinical response were associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: : Reirradiation can offer long-term survival for patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head/neck cancers.

Dramatic prostate-specific antigen response with activated hemicellulose compound in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is an incurable disease with limited treatment options. Herbal supplements are unconventional treatments for a variety of diseases. Active hemicellulose compound (AHCC) is a Japanese supplement discovered by hybridizing several mushrooms used in traditional healing for the purpose of maintaining 'super immunity'. We report on a 66-year-old gentleman with CRPC with an excellent serologic response to AHCC. This case hypothesizes that AHCC may have potential activity against CRPC.

Testicular lymphoma: an update for clinicians.

Testicular lymphoma is a lethal disease with a median survival of approximately 12 to 24 months. It is the most common testicular malignancy in men older than 60 years of age. Testicular lymphoma has a predilection for widespread dissemination to unusual sites, including the central nervous system, contralateral testis, Waldeyer's ring, skin, and lung. Doxorubicin based chemotherapy with prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy and radiation to the contralateral testis seems most promising. This review article will focus on the presentation, pathology, patterns of relapse and challenges in improving the outcome of this disease.

Phase I dose escalation study of vinorelbine and topotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A platinum doublet is the current standard treatment for good performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with good performance status. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicities, therefore alternative platinum-free combinations should be investigated. Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that exerts its cytotoxic effect through stabilization of the topoisomerase I-DNA complex. Preclinical data suggests synergy between topoisomerase I inhibitors and mitotic spindle poisons. Considerable hematologic toxicities have been reported with topotecan dosed for 5 consecutive days in combination with vinorelbine. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal dosage and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed or refractory non-small cell or small cell lung cancer administered on an alternate dosing schedule. METHODS: From February, 2004 to March, 2007 eighteen patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC or SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated with 22% having received at least 3 prior lines of chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered at a fixed dose (20 mg/m2) and topotecan at escalating doses (2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. RESULTS: The MTD was not reached in any of the 5 cohorts, with only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in cohort 4. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable. One patient had a partial response with four patients (27%) achieving stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survival for all patients, were 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 9.1) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 4.2, 22.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine and topotecan administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days is well tolerated without any DLT seen with previously investigated topotecan schedules. This doublet provides a potentially active non-platinum containing doublet for the treatment of patients with advanced SCLC and NSCLC. Vinorelbine and topotecan should therefore be investigated in subsequent phase II studies at a dose of 20 mg/m2 and 4 mg/m2, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00287963.

Bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib, and ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors, such as bortezomib, can down-regulate NF-kappaB, a transcription factor implicated in tumor growth. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received escalating doses of bortezomib either on a weekly schedule (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 repeated every 42 days) or on a twice-weekly administration schedule (days 1, 4, 8, and 11 repeated every 21 days), in combination with escalating doses of celecoxib twice daily throughout the study period from 200 mg to 400 mg twice daily. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the study period. Two patients had stable disease lasting for four and five months each, and sixteen patients developed progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of bortezomib and celecoxib was well tolerated, without dose limiting toxicities observed throughout the dosing ranges tested, and will be studied further at the highest dose levels investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00290680.